Author Archives: WesWoodell

For Church Leaders: Helping your local congregation become evangelistically focused

You’re a church leader and have a heart for the lost in your community, but your church members don’t seem to share your passion. You desperately want your congregation to become more focused on reaching the lost, but you’re not sure where to start. How do you help a church that’s traditionally been inwardly focused change? How do you help the church members you’re serving develop a passion for reaching the lost?

For the last couple of years I’ve received a steady stream of questions in the form of phone calls and emails from people around the country about this issue (and let me tell you – we’re ALL in trouble when people start coming to me for answers!).

My dad and I were talking about this on the way to the deer woods the other day, and I jotted down some thoughts on a legal pad while I was sitting on my stand. He requested a copy of them, and I just finished typing them up.

Since this is a hot topic, I thought I’d share the notes here.

Here you go (note: these are rough, but they’re just notes!):

Helping the Local Church Become Evangelistic

 

  • Begins with Leadership

Leadership and teaching determines direction. Church leadership must determine that evangelism is going to be a priority, and the vision for and high priority of reaching the lost for Christ must be clearly articulated. Evangelism should be brought up regularly in teaching. The goal is to get church members to internalize the message “my mission as a follower of Christ is to bring Jesus to a lost world!” Once a congregation internalizes that message, they’ll make it part of their everyday thinking and conversation – it becomes contagious!

  • Leaders must model evangelistic priority

In addition to talking about evangelism, leaders must model what it means to be evangelistic. Church members should see leaders sharing Jesus with others themselves – this is the only way to give your call to be evangelistic credibility. All talk + no action = zero credibility and zero change in your congregation.

  • Evangelists and new converts should be recognized and encouraged

Time should be set aside during corporate assemblies (like Sunday morning) for the people who studied with a new convert to introduce them to the rest of the church. Baptisms should never simply be a bullet point in the bulletin – or, even worse – not recognized at all! Special attention and an extra helping of encouragement should be given to new Christians, and evangelists should be given plenty of pats on the back too.

  • o NOTE: Evangelists should be warned about impure motivations. It’s ok to feel good after being recognized for bringing someone to the Lord, but those pats on the back should neverbecome the primary motivator for being evangelistic! Serving God should, seeing someone’s life change for the better should, and carrying out Jesus’ command to reach a lost world in His name should. All glory goes to God, and evangelists must check their motives. Satan will do whatever he can to puff someone up – evangelists must remain humble.

 

  • Individual members should be equipped to perform personal Bible studies

If you want your church to truly be evangelistic at its core, intentional steps should be taken to equip members to perform personal, evangelistic Bible studies. The #1 reason most people say they don’t share their faith is because they’re afraid to, and the #1 reason they’re afraid to is because they don’t know where to start. Evangelistic Bible studies give a novice evangelist a starting point. Over time and with additional study, most who regularly practice sharing their faith will come to a point where it’s very comfortable for them, but they’ll never get there without starting somewhere. Ideally, we should all know Scripture well enough to study with someone without a study guide, but most people aren’t there. Thus, church members should be equipped with an effective evangelistic study to serve as a starting point for further skill development.

  • o NOTE: In the past, churches making the transition from being inwardly focused to being outwardly focused have set aside class time on Sunday mornings to take the entire congregation through equipping sessions by training them in evangelistic study. Churches I’m familiar with that have done this have had great success.

 

  • Identify your church’s evangelists, and get them to train other members

Get your evangelists to reproduce themselves by bringing other church members along when they’re studying with someone. This is the best way to help evangelists-in-training overcome the jitters. When going through a study, the person being trained should be required to take notes over it to hand to the person being studied with at the end. In addition to being useful to the person being studied with, this practice will help the trainee internalize the message of the evangelistic study. The note taker should write legibly, and the person being studied with should be instructed to go home, look over the notes, and write down any questions they might have to be dealt with next time.

  • In addition to Bible studies, each member should learn to use their own story to share Jesus with others

Everyone has a story, and stories are meant to be shared. No two stories are alike – all are unique. Some people’s conversion stories are very dramatic (like Paul’s story leading up to seeing Jesus on the Damascus Road) – others are less dramatic, but still very powerful (like the disciples who recognized Jesus on the Emmaus Road). Time should regularly be set aside (once a month or every six weeks) for testimonies to be shared in the assembly – especially those of new convert’s. Unless someone is an experienced public speaker, it would probably be a good idea for those sharing to meet with a leader ahead of time to structure their testimony in the form of an outline (or to simply write the whole thing down to read it), and it would also be a good idea to encourage them to go over it a couple of times in advance.  Those too shy to share in a large assembly could do it on video (editing video is very easy with Windows Movie Maker – a free program that comes with XP and Vista), and if that’s still too much they could do it in a small group. Testimonies should be shared with as many people as possible (like on Sunday mornings). This serves three main purposes: 1) It keeps the congregation focused on its evangelistic mission because they’re constantly hearing about lives being transformed around them. 2) Its good practice for believers in articulating how Jesus saved them. Their story will be a very powerful tool in their own personal evangelism. 3) People sharing their faith in Jesus publicly are making a profound declaration in front of a lot of people – they’re saying that they’re living their lives according to God’s will, and God will bless that confession and encourage others through it. In addition to that, they’ll be expected to walk what they talk giving them needed accountability. Because of this, it’s a good idea for new converts should share their testimony in front of as many people as possible as soon as possible.

  • Outwardly focused small groups should be part of your evangelistic strategy

Often, small groups will be your initial contact point with outsiders, but only if church members involved are actively befriending outsiders and regularly inviting new people. When a relationship exists, outsiders will often be more likely to attend an informal Bible study in someone’s home before they’ll attend a Sunday service or before they’ll agree to a personal study.

  • Effective evangelism involves more than simply passion – it involves skill

In his book The Purpose Driven Church, Rick Warren points out the fact that effective ministry takes more than passion or want to – it takes skill. The same is true of effective personal evangelism. Yes, some of your church members have a gift for evangelism and will be very comfortable exercising it freely, but all of your church members should be evangelistic regardless of their giftedness. That being said, effective evangelism takes a certain amount of skill, and skill must be developed. Skill development takes dedication, time, and, most of all, practice! Most of your church members will be incredibly uncomfortable when initially engaging in personal evangelism, but the more they do it the easier it will become. Familiarity brings comfort, and when you consider the fact that Jesus Christ is the only avenue for a lost world to come into contact with the Living God thereby being saved, we as God’s people should be very familiar and comfortable with sharing the Good News with others, and if we’re not we have a responsibility to remedy that! The more experience in personal evangelism a person has the more skill they will develop, and experience only comes with practice. Fear is overcome by allowing the message of Jesus to overflow – share it!

Tagged , , ,

God is a Fire

“God is a fire that warms and kindles the heart and inward parts. Hence, if we feel in our hearts the cold which comes from the devil – for the devil is cold – let us call on the Lord. He will come to warm our hearts with perfect love, not only for Him but also for our neighbor, and the cold of him who hates the good will flee before the heat of His countenance.” 

– St. Seraphim of Sarov

More sayings of the Desert Fathers

Tagged ,

‘Religulous’ in a nutshell

Last month in this post I promised you a review of Religulous so that you don’t have to watch it yourself (check out the trailer).

Religulous reveals the latest work of Bill Maher – the controversial former host of Politically Incorrect (whose show was cancelled after he stated he believed the terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attacks were brave).

If you haven’t already heard, this Religulous flick is basically two hours of bashing religion captured on film, and 85% of it is aimed at Christianity. As I mentioned in the other post, I went to see this movie in San Francisco by myself in a theater full of people who saw fit to applaud at the end. It was an interesting experience, and I took notes.

Some of you might be wondering why I would spend money on a ticket for something like this. Here’s why: it will create an opportunity for me to have a meaningful dialogue with people influenced by this garbage.

If I have no idea what this movie is about or what the content is, I’ll have a harder time refuting some of the stupid, false, ignorant claims the film makes.

I’m sure most of you remember the movie The Da Vinci Code. In it, the basic story makes the claim that Jesus had actually been married to Mary Magdalene and the falsity of the gospel accounts was a closely guarded secret of this shady group behind the Catholic Church (in the story the Catholic Church was simply an organization which had been set up as a control device for the powers that be).

Religion was portrayed as a complex system of lies that exists only to control the masses without an ounce of truth behind it’s claims.

I didn’t watch The Da Vinci Code – I read the book, and I’m glad I did. Even though that book is found in the fiction section of your local bookstore, I still have people that bring up the “fact” that Jesus was actually married in discussion sometimes. If I were completely ignorant of where that information came from and didn’t know where to begin in addressing it, I’d be hindered in teaching them.

That being said, Religulous is even more dangerous because it won’t be found in the fiction section – its actually presented as truth. The movie claims to be full of “facts;” unfortunately the producers must have used the same fact checkers employed by the Weekly World News. 

Here’s what you need to know:

1) Bill Maher is an entertainer and a comedian – not a scholar or person serious about seeking truth.

Key to remember: Bill Maher made this movie to make money– not to make the world a better place. Bill entered into working on this project with a particular worldview (as evidenced by his previous public statements and stand up routines), and he finished this project with the same worldview. He’s a hostile atheist who thinks people who believe in God are stupid, and he automatically assumes intellectual superiority over those who disagree.

 

2) Bill Maher’s view of the church is shaped by a nominal Catholic upbringing.

He frequently makes reference to his Catholic upbringing and says things in the film like “rational people think they drink the blood of a 2,000 year old God.”

Apparently his parents took him to mass growing up, but stopped attending altogether when they decided to start using birth control. His mother was in the film, and made it clear that she could care less whether her son believes in God or not.

Some of the sillier doctrines taught by the Catholic Church are viewed by Maher as mainstream and presented as so in the film. That brings me to my next point:

 

3) Maher presents a distorted view of mainstream Christianity.

In other words, the things he presents as happening in mainstream Christianity are in fact found only on the fringes. Maher focuses on speaking to people who largely don’t really represent mainstream Christian beliefs.

He splices in footage of people like Robert Tilton (more famous for being YouTube’s “farting preacher”) incoherently babbling like a fool along with plenty of other clips of reported Christians saying or doing very stupid things (like a lady who says from a pulpit she wanted God to give people “a Holy Ghost enima” or the guys from Way of the Master teaching students to “circumvent people’s intellect” as part of their evangelistic strategy).

 

4) Maher doesn’t interview a single credible Bible scholar.

Instead of interviewing someone like Josh McDowell or Lee Strobel, Maher interviews people like the men at a trucker’s chapel (a chapel built into the side of a truck stop), “Dr.” Jeremiah Cummings (a televangelist who possesses no degree at all and would be more than happy to accept your donations), Kenneth Ham (who believes Adam & Eve rode dinosaurs), and the actor who plays Jesus at Orlando’s Holy Land Experience (a first-century Jerusalem-themed amusement park).

Surprisingly, the Jesus actor seemed to be the most coherent person interviewed in the entire film!

 

5) Maher gets basic facts wrong again and again.

Maher has obviously never conducted a serious investigation into the claims of Christianity. He gets facts wrong that are so basic, yet he’s made a widely distributed and controversial feature film to refute the claims of Christianity.

Before the movie I didn’t think the man was stupid – misguided, yes, but not stupid – but after watching I’m thinking I may have been too generous in giving him the benefit of the doubt.

If a person is going to make a movie like this, you would think some basic research of the topic would be in order. Apparently that didn’t happen.

Here’s a list of some of the stupid things this movie puts forth as “facts”:

  • “There’s no proof that Jesus ever existed.” (Wrong! There’s more historical evidence proving His existence than almost any other character in history)
  • None of the gospel writers knew or had even ever seen Jesus. (Wrong! Matthew and John were two of the Twelve Apostles, and Mark and Luke are believed to have written down the sermons of Peter and Paul, respectively.)
  • None of the gospel writers were historians. (Wrong! Doctor Luke was a serious historian whose accounts are corroborated by other recorded events in history.)
  • All the Scriptures condemning homosexuality come from the Old Testament – the New Testament says nothing about it. (Wrong! The New Testament codemns the practice of homosexuality along with the Old. See Romans 1:25-27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10.)
  • The story surrounding the Egyptian god Horus predates and parallels the story of Christ. In other words, the story of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection was simply made up. (Wrong! The story of Horus predating the story of Christ is an urban legend – no historical sources support this because they don’t exist.) NOTE: Read more about this on Ben Witherington’s blog – these false claims about Horus were popularized by the film ‘The Zeitgeist Movie’.

 

6) Maher’s not nearly as disrespectful to Muslims as he is to people of other faith groups.

Apparently even Bill Maher has his limits. He significantly tones down the rhetoric when it comes to talking about Islam.

Despite his belief that there is no God and when you die you’re simply dead, Maher wants to keep on living.

Hrmph – what’s the point, Bill?

 

Concluding Thoughts

The film tries, but doesn’t even come close to putting a dent into the claims of Christianity.

While Religulous is well put together and hilariously edited, it falls short in revealing a real search for the honest truth. Rather, in the spirit of a Michael Moore film, it simply exists to poke fun, mock, and push an agenda without any real digging for truth taking place.

The sad thing is, many people will buy into what Maher has to say hook, line, and sinker without doing any real looking themselves.

It’d be nice if someone would produce a rebuttal film to this one.

In conclusion, Maher’s facts are wrong, his motives are impure, his eyes are blind, and his heart is hard. I can identify with where he is now because I was once there myself, and that gives me hope for him.

Please keep him and those this film will impact negatively in your prayers.

Tagged , , , , ,