Tag Archives: rob bell

Preview the full BASIC Series for free this week

At the risk of being accused of Francis Chan overkill on the blog this week, the BASIC films are available to view for free at premiere.basicseries.com.

Free viewing is available this week only, and the next film in the series will be available every 24 hours until they run through the set (a countdown at the bottom of the screen indicates when the next one will be available).

If you haven’t heard of the BASIC films, they are teaching tools made by the same folks who produced Rob Bell’s Nooma Videos, only this time Francis Chan is the one doing the teaching (which is amusing considering my previous post).

I just watched BASIC: Fellowship, and must say I’m impressed. Check it out for yourself – it’s worth it.

The films can be purchased from store.flannel.org – $10.00 for DVDs, $7.00 for digital downloads. I’ll be picking these up.

Go here if you want to ‘like’ the BASIC Series on Facebook.

Anything we can use to articulate the truth of Jesus is something I’m willing to be a fan of.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Francis Chan Weighs In on the Hell Debate

As regular readers of this blog are aware, a huge debate surrounding the topic of hell was spawned recently due to the release of a new a book called Love Wins by Rob Bell – a Michigan megachurch pastor and alum of Fuller (my school).

In his book Rob says hell doesn’t exist – at least not as Christians have traditionally understood it (read the Time Magazine article on the book here). Bell’s reason for thinking this? He can’t wrap his mind around how God can send those who reject Him to hell for an eternity and still be called ‘loving’ (a view driven by anthropomorphism – “God isn’t doing what I would do or what I agree with, therefore this God can’t be referred to as ‘loving’ or even really God …”).

I’m happy to announce Francis Chan is coming out with a new book called Erasing Hell – a humble response to the current hell debate, and a reasoned critique of theological views defined by anthropomorphic tendencies.

A key scripture Chan points to is this one in which God speaks:

Isaiah 55:8-9
8 “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,” declares the LORD.
9 “As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.

Could it be, when we are tempted to write God off when He does something we wouldn’t have done or in a way we wouldn’t have done it, or says something we wouldn’t say, or thinks in a way we wouldn’t think, that HE is not the one with a problem? Could it be that HE is perfect and we are not, therefore we will always view his actions through imperfect, flawed lenses? Could it be that He really is loving regardless of what He chooses to do, because what He chooses to do will ALWAYS be right, holy, pure, and just – simply because that’s His inherent, perfect nature?

See, this debate isn’t simply about hell. This debate is really about trusting in God as holy and righteous and loving and perfect, even when we don’t understand everything. At its core, this debate is about our belief in the goodness of God regardless of our incomplete understanding or comprehension of Him.

A question we must ask: Is God really good “all the time,” or only when imperfect, flawed, so and so says? I choose to believe the former – not the latter.

You can pick up Francis’ new book after July 1 of this year. Here’s a promo video:

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,